Comments for Griffon26's Blog

Comment on Planner and libgda-3 support by Werner

Werner — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:16:12 +0000

Hi!
Thanks for the hint but
URL for downloading
coplanner-0.1.tar.gz
is dead for days now, unfortunately.

Compiled aktuell HEAD (includes the patch)
successful on updated fedora8,
but had to change in autogen.sh
automake-1.9 to automake-1.10
aclocal-1.9 to aclocal-1.10

regards,
Werner

Comment on Planner and libgda-3 support by Griffon26

Griffon26 — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:30:52 +0000

You should probably take a look at the messages in this thread:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/planner-dev-list/2008-March/msg00005.html

So basically it doesn’t, but there are some people working on collaborative planning. We’ll probably need some consolidation here.

Comment on Planner and libgda-3 support by Werner

Werner — Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:50:31 +0000

Hello!
Can’t figure out if Planner with database support
provides some kind of locking, to enable team-/group-work!?
greatings,
Werner

Comment on Fixing dependency loops by Griffon26

Griffon26 — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:45:39 +0000

WBS numbers can only be used to see if one task is a (indirect) child of another. You will still need to check if there are any predecessor relationships that create a cycle.

For a task with WBS 1.3.6.4.4 you would have to check 1.3.6.4, 1.3.6, 1.3 and 1 because you don’t know in advance where the loop might be. But these are the same tasks that you will encounter when you walk forward through the graph. (They are connected through ‘next’ pointers.)

The advantages of the graph are that we use only one method of traversal (simpler) and that you can mark nodes as visited, preventing unnecessary processing.

Comment on Fixing dependency loops by Max

Max — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:34:32 +0000

Hello,

And couldn’t we use the WBS number to check where we are in the tree and quickly detect loops instead of parsing the connected nodes ?

Comment on Planner and libgda-3 support by dan

dan — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:41:37 +0000

Terrific! I’m glad to see activity around planner. For some reason, foss has really not risen to the challenge of good pm software. Lots of proprietary projects out there, some pretty good. Little activity on the foss front.

Thanks for the hard work!

Comment on Who’d a thunk it? by Max

Max — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:00:11 +0000

Hi Maurice,

I oftently wondered what you were working on.
I’ll now be able to spy you on this blog

Thanks for your time.

Max