<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixing dependency loops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://griffon26.kfk4ever.com/wordpress/2008/03/15/5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://griffon26.kfk4ever.com/wordpress/2008/03/15/5/</link>
	<description>A weblog about Planner, Gentoo and whatever I'm working on.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:16:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Griffon26</title>
		<link>http://griffon26.kfk4ever.com/wordpress/2008/03/15/5/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffon26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://griffon26.kfk4ever.com/wordpress/2008/03/15/5/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>WBS numbers can only be used to see if one task is a (indirect) child of another. You will still need to check if there are any predecessor relationships that create a cycle. 

For a task with WBS 1.3.6.4.4 you would have to check 1.3.6.4, 1.3.6, 1.3 and 1 because you don&#039;t know in advance where the loop might be. But these are the same tasks that you will encounter when you walk forward through the graph. (They are connected through &#039;next&#039; pointers.)

The advantages of the graph are that we use only one method of traversal (simpler) and that you can mark nodes as visited, preventing unnecessary processing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WBS numbers can only be used to see if one task is a (indirect) child of another. You will still need to check if there are any predecessor relationships that create a cycle. </p>
<p>For a task with WBS 1.3.6.4.4 you would have to check 1.3.6.4, 1.3.6, 1.3 and 1 because you don&#8217;t know in advance where the loop might be. But these are the same tasks that you will encounter when you walk forward through the graph. (They are connected through &#8216;next&#8217; pointers.)</p>
<p>The advantages of the graph are that we use only one method of traversal (simpler) and that you can mark nodes as visited, preventing unnecessary processing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://griffon26.kfk4ever.com/wordpress/2008/03/15/5/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://griffon26.kfk4ever.com/wordpress/2008/03/15/5/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hello,

And couldn&#039;t we use the WBS number to check where we are in the tree and quickly detect loops instead of parsing the connected nodes ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>And couldn&#8217;t we use the WBS number to check where we are in the tree and quickly detect loops instead of parsing the connected nodes ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
